Compare TOP Keywords Factor Months
|
Name | Correlation | #1 Max | Page 1 Avg | Usage % | Searches % | |||
1 | enter | Number of Unique LSI Words Used Diversity | -0.29 | 971 | 295 | 91 % | 22 % | |
2 | Down 1 | Variations in HTML Tags Relevancy | -0.25 | +0.01 | 64602 | 254 | 85 % | 96 % |
3 | Down 1 | Variations in Body Tags Relevancy | -0.25 | 58631 | 243 | 88 % | 93 % | |
4 | enter | Number of Unique Variations Used Diversity | -0.23 | 24 | 7 | 85 % | 23 % | |
5 | Down 2 | Variations in Div Tags Relevancy | -0.23 | 33273 | 138 | 83 % | 94 % | |
6 | Up 6 | Variations in A Tags Relevancy | -0.22 | -0.01 | 5363 | 28 | 75 % | 90 % |
7 | Down 3 | Variations in H1-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.22 | 380 | 9 | 76 % | 91 % | |
8 | Down 3 | Variations in H1, H2, and H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.22 | +0.01 | 290 | 7 | 75 % | 91 % |
9 | Down 2 | Variations in P Tags Relevancy | -0.21 | 5310 | 34 | 73 % | 93 % | |
10 | Up 3 | Variations in LI Tags Relevancy | -0.21 | 1869 | 19 | 68 % | 91 % | |
11 | Up 13 | Term Frequency Relevancy | -0.21 | -0.01 | 6 | 3 | 84 % | 92 % |
12 | Down 6 | Variations in H1 and H2 Tags Relevancy | -0.21 | +0.01 | 141 | 5 | 73 % | 89 % |
13 | Up 3 | Variations in Sentences Relevancy | -0.2 | 4680 | 30 | 73 % | 90 % | |
14 | Exact Matches in the HTML Tag Relevancy | -0.2 | +0.01 | 470 | 23 | 45 % | 89 % | |
15 | Up 18 | Variations in ALT Attributes Relevancy | -0.2 | -0.01 | 379 | 9 | 52 % | 87 % |
16 | Up 1 | Clean Keyword Density in the HTML Tag Relevancy | -0.2 | 203 | 4 | 79 % | 79 % | |
17 | Down 9 | Variations in Search Result Display URL Relevancy | -0.19 | +0.01 | 17 | 2 | 87 % | 76 % |
18 | Down 9 | Variations in Search Result Link Text Relevancy | -0.19 | +0.01 | 17 | 2 | 87 % | 76 % |
19 | Up 16 | Variations in Distinct A Tag HREF Attributes Relevancy | -0.19 | 1983 | 35 | 69 % | 91 % | |
20 | Up 14 | Variations in A Tag HREF Attributes Relevancy | -0.19 | 2708 | 52 | 70 % | 91 % | |
21 | Down 6 | Variations in Script Tags Relevancy | -0.19 | +0.01 | 11547 | 53 | 64 % | 92 % |
22 | Down 1 | Variations in H2 Tags Relevancy | -0.19 | 122 | 4 | 49 % | 89 % | |
23 | Up 8 | Leading Variations in H1-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.19 | 43 | 2 | 51 % | 89 % | |
24 | Up 2 | Leading Variations in H1, H2, and H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.18 | +0.01 | 31 | 2 | 48 % | 89 % |
25 | Variation Density in Top 30KB Relevancy | -0.18 | 352 | 3 | 71 % | 82 % | ||
26 | Up 6 | Exact Matches in H1-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.18 | 12 | 2 | 34 % | 86 % | |
27 | Up 3 | Variations in Span Tags Relevancy | -0.18 | +0.01 | 815 | 10 | 55 % | 91 % |
28 | Down 9 | Variations in the Title Tag Relevancy | -0.17 | +0.01 | 18 | 2 | 76 % | 77 % |
29 | Down 11 | Variations in Search Result URL Path Relevancy | -0.17 | +0.02 | 11 | 2 | 59 % | 74 % |
30 | Up 18 | Variations in Nav Tags Relevancy | -0.17 | -0.01 | 6895 | 25 | 46 % | 87 % |
31 | Up 5 | Exact Matches in Top 30KB Relevancy | -0.17 | +0.01 | 37 | 4 | 35 % | 67 % |
32 | Down 22 | Leading Variations in Title Tag Relevancy | -0.17 | 1 | 1 | 37 % | 79 % | |
33 | Down 11 | Variations in the Canonical URL Relevancy | -0.17 | +0.01 | 50 | 2 | 57 % | 80 % |
34 | Up 4 | Variations in H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.17 | 150 | 3 | 35 % | 89 % | |
35 | Down 15 | Variations in Main Tags Relevancy | -0.16 | 12451 | 63 | 34 % | 83 % | |
36 | Down 25 | Variations in Search Result Document File Name Relevancy | -0.16 | +0.03 | 9 | 2 | 62 % | 63 % |
37 | Up 5 | Variations in H1 Tags Relevancy | -0.16 | 20 | 2 | 64 % | 79 % | |
38 | Down 10 | Leading Variations in H1 Tags Relevancy | -0.16 | 2 | 1 | 33 % | 79 % | |
39 | Down 12 | Variations in Meta Description Relevancy | -0.16 | +0.01 | 43 | 2 | 58 % | 80 % |
40 | Down 11 | TF/IDF Relevancy | -0.16 | -0.01 | 1 | 1 | 64 % | 83 % |
41 | Down 4 | Variations in Search Result URL Relevancy | -0.16 | +0.01 | 20 | 2 | 62 % | 75 % |
42 | Up 1 | Variations in Absolute URLs Relevancy | -0.16 | +0.01 | 6915 | 56 | 64 % | 87 % |
43 | Up 9 | Exact Matches in Sentences Relevancy | -0.16 | 59 | 3 | 29 % | 88 % | |
44 | Up 14 | Variation Count in Top 30KB Relevancy | -0.16 | -0.01 | 5520 | 34 | 79 % | 79 % |
45 | Up 9 | Variations in First 100 Words Relevancy | -0.15 | 203 | 7 | 64 % | 74 % | |
46 | Down 5 | Exact Matches in Title Tag Relevancy | -0.15 | 2 | 1 | 30 % | 79 % | |
47 | Up 2 | Variations making whole H1-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.15 | -0.01 | 4 | 1 | 17 % | 78 % |
48 | Up 12 | Variations in Footer Tags Relevancy | -0.15 | 3287 | 10 | 33 % | 81 % | |
49 | Up 7 | Variations making whole H1, H2, and H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.15 | -0.01 | 2 | 1 | 16 % | 76 % |
50 | Up 17 | Exact Matches in A Tags Relevancy | -0.15 | 51 | 4 | 27 % | 85 % | |
51 | Down 11 | Variations in Section Tags Relevancy | -0.15 | 2897 | 18 | 36 % | 86 % | |
52 | Up 9 | Variations in TITLE Attributes Relevancy | -0.15 | 195 | 7 | 36 % | 85 % | |
53 | Down 30 | Exact Matches in Body Tag Relevancy | -0.14 | +0.05 | 350 | 17 | 30 % | 91 % |
54 | Down 8 | Leading Variations in H2 Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | +0.01 | 13 | 1 | 23 % | 85 % |
55 | Up 2 | Exact Matches in H1 Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | 2 | 1 | 25 % | 79 % | |
56 | Down 12 | Variations Making Whole LI Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | 5 | 1 | 26 % | 78 % | |
57 | Down 2 | Exact Matches in H2 Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | 6 | 1 | 17 % | 85 % | |
58 | Up 7 | Variations Making Whole Span Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | 10 | 1 | 20 % | 84 % | |
59 | Up 3 | Variations in Strong Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | 144 | 3 | 30 % | 82 % | |
60 | Down 9 | Variations making whole A Tags Relevancy | -0.14 | +0.01 | 21 | 1 | 32 % | 80 % |
61 | Down 2 | Variations in the last 100 words Relevancy | -0.13 | +0.01 | 200 | 4 | 49 % | 76 % |
62 | Down 15 | Variations in I Tags Relevancy | -0.13 | 568 | 7 | 33 % | 78 % | |
63 | Up 1 | Variations making whole H1 Tags Relevancy | -0.13 | -0.01 | 1 | 1 | 11 % | 75 % |
64 | Down 11 | Variations in Article Tags Relevancy | -0.13 | 3344 | 18 | 29 % | 75 % | |
65 | Up 1 | Exact Matches in Meta Description Relevancy | -0.13 | +0.01 | 5 | 1 | 20 % | 80 % |
66 | Up 5 | Variations in H4-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.13 | -0.01 | 91 | 2 | 20 % | 79 % |
67 | Up 2 | Leading Variations in H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.13 | 18 | 1 | 16 % | 82 % | |
68 | Up 6 | Variations in Button Tags Relevancy | -0.13 | -0.01 | 391 | 1 | 7 % | 79 % |
69 | Down 30 | Variations in Search Result Summary Relevancy | -0.12 | +0.02 | 48 | 3 | 86 % | 59 % |
70 | Down 7 | Variations in B Tags Relevancy | -0.12 | 239 | 4 | 16 % | 77 % | |
71 | Down 1 | Variations in H4 Tags Relevancy | -0.12 | -0.01 | 61 | 1 | 16 % | 79 % |
72 | Down 4 | Variations in ID Attributes Relevancy | -0.12 | 474 | 2 | 13 % | 83 % | |
73 | Up 2 | Variations in Figure Tags Relevancy | -0.12 | 2434 | 9 | 13 % | 73 % | |
74 | Down 29 | Exact Match Density in Top 30KB Relevancy | -0.12 | +0.02 | 3 | 1 | 16 % | 48 % |
75 | Down 2 | Variations in Aside Tags Relevancy | -0.11 | 153 | 4 | 13 % | 72 % | |
76 | Up 1 | Variations in Class Attributes Relevancy | -0.11 | +0.01 | 7115 | 11 | 24 % | 79 % |
77 | Down 27 | Variations in Search Result URL Domain Name Relevancy | -0.11 | +0.03 | 6 | 1 | 4 % | 49 % |
78 | Up 8 | Exact Matches in Questions Relevancy | -0.11 | 6 | 1 | 9 % | 87 % | |
79 | Up 11 | Exact Matches making whole H1-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.11 | -0.01 | 3 | 1 | 7 % | 80 % |
80 | Up 11 | Exact Matches making whole H1, H2, and H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.11 | -0.01 | 2 | 1 | 7 % | 79 % |
81 | Up 6 | Exact Matches in H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.11 | 6 | 1 | 9 % | 85 % | |
82 | Down 6 | Variations in Em Tags Relevancy | -0.11 | 40 | 1 | 8 % | 69 % | |
83 | Down 2 | Leading Variations in H4-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.1 | -0.01 | 12 | 1 | 10 % | 74 % |
84 | Variations in Value Attributes Relevancy | -0.1 | 116 | 2 | 14 % | 74 % | ||
85 | Leading Variations in H4 Tags Relevancy | -0.1 | -0.01 | 9 | 1 | 7 % | 72 % | |
86 | Down 14 | Leading Variations in Meta Description Relevancy | -0.1 | 1 | 1 | 10 % | 65 % | |
87 | Up 6 | Variations in HTML Comment Tags Relevancy | -0.1 | -0.02 | 152 | 2 | 7 % | 71 % |
88 | Up 1 | Variations in H5 Tags Relevancy | -0.1 | -0.01 | 19 | 1 | 6 % | 70 % |
89 | Down 7 | Variations in Meta Keywords Relevancy | -0.1 | 9 | 1 | 13 % | 59 % | |
90 | Down 11 | Variations in Host Citations Relevancy | -0.1 | +0.01 | 1762 | 6 | 9 % | 79 % |
91 | Down 13 | Variations Making Whole Strong Tags Relevancy | -0.09 | +0.01 | 5 | 1 | 6 % | 75 % |
92 | Down 9 | Variations in Label Tags Relevancy | -0.09 | 22 | 1 | 5 % | 77 % | |
93 | Down 13 | Variations in Form Tags Relevancy | -0.09 | +0.01 | 59 | 1 | 11 % | 72 % |
94 | Up 1 | Exact Matches making whole H1 Tags Relevancy | -0.09 | -0.01 | 1 | 1 | 5 % | 80 % |
95 | Down 3 | Variations in Figcaption Tags Relevancy | -0.09 | 82 | 1 | 4 % | 65 % | |
96 | Down 8 | Variations in Search Result URL Host Name Relevancy | -0.08 | +0.01 | 6 | 1 | 3 % | 64 % |
97 | Variations in Option Tags Relevancy | -0.08 | -0.01 | 49 | 1 | 5 % | 76 % | |
98 | Down 2 | Variations in U Tags Relevancy | -0.08 | 65 | 1 | 3 % | 72 % | |
99 | Up 2 | Aggressive Variation Density Relevancy | -0.08 | -0.01 | 1182 | 2 | 6 % | 65 % |
100 | Up 4 | Variations making whole H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | -0.02 | 2 | 1 | 3 % | 70 % |
101 | Down 7 | Variations in Blockquote Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | +0.01 | 37 | 1 | 3 % | 64 % |
102 | Down 3 | Exact Matches making whole A Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | 2 | 1 | 6 % | 78 % | |
103 | Down 5 | Variations in NAME Attributes Relevancy | -0.07 | 60 | 1 | 2 % | 74 % | |
104 | Down 4 | Variations in H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | 12 | 1 | 2 % | 69 % | |
105 | Down 2 | Variations in Fieldset Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | -0.01 | 229 | 2 | 2 % | 69 % |
106 | Variations making whole H4-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | -0.01 | 3 | 1 | 2 % | 71 % | |
107 | Down 2 | Exact Matches in H4 Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | -0.01 | 4 | 1 | 3 % | 81 % |
108 | Down 6 | Leading Variations in H5 Tags Relevancy | -0.07 | -0.01 | 3 | 1 | 2 % | 71 % |
109 | Up 2 | Variations making whole H4 Tags Relevancy | -0.06 | -0.01 | 3 | 1 | 2 % | 75 % |
110 | Down 2 | Variations Making Whole Option Tags Relevancy | -0.05 | 4 | 0 | 2 % | 77 % | |
111 | Down 4 | Variations making whole B Tags Relevancy | -0.05 | 4 | 1 | 1 % | 76 % | |
112 | Down 2 | Exact Matches in Search Result URL Relevancy | -0.05 | 1 | 0 | 9 % | 74 % | |
113 | Down 1 | Exact Matches making whole H2 Tags Relevancy | -0.05 | -0.01 | 1 | 0 | 1 % | 81 % |
114 | Down 5 | Variations in Search Result URL Parameters Relevancy | -0.04 | 1 | 0 | 1 % | 59 % | |
115 | Down 2 | Leading Variations in H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.04 | -0.01 | 5 | 0 | 1 % | 75 % |
116 | Up 1 | Variations in Cite Tags Relevancy | -0.04 | -0.01 | 9 | 0 | 0 % | 83 % |
117 | Down 3 | Exact Matches in Search Result Summary Relevancy | -0.03 | 1 | 0 | 5 % | 72 % | |
118 | Down 3 | Variations in Details Tags Relevancy | -0.03 | 18 | 0 | 1 % | 82 % | |
119 | Exact Matches in H5 Tags Relevancy | -0.03 | -0.01 | 2 | 0 | 1 % | 82 % | |
120 | Down 4 | Exact Matches in Search Result Link Text Relevancy | -0.03 | +0.01 | 1 | 0 | 9 % | 63 % |
121 | Up 1 | Variations Making Whole Title Tag Relevancy | -0.03 | -0.01 | 1 | 0 | 1 % | 78 % |
122 | Down 4 | Variations Making Whole I Tags Relevancy | -0.03 | 3 | 0 | 0 % | 83 % | |
123 | Up 27 | Variations in Style Tags Relevancy | -0.03 | -0.02 | 15136 | 8 | 3 % | 94 % |
124 | Down 4 | Variations in Address Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 11 | 0 | 1 % | 83 % | |
125 | Down 4 | Variations in Header Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 11 | 0 | 1 % | 83 % | |
126 | Down 3 | Variations in NoScript Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 885 | 1 | 0 % | 83 % | |
127 | Down 1 | Exact Matches making whole H3 Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | -0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0 % | 85 % |
128 | Down 4 | Variations in Caption Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 10 | 0 | 0 % | 89 % | |
129 | Down 2 | Variations making whole H5 Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 81 % | |
130 | Down 1 | Variations in Summary Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | -0.01 | 10 | 0 | 0 % | 91 % |
131 | Down 3 | Variations in Template Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 22 | 0 | 0 % | 85 % | |
132 | Up 2 | Exact Match Density Relevancy | -0.02 | 2 | 0 | 1 % | 80 % | |
133 | Down 2 | Variations making whole H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 86 % | |
134 | Down 9 | Exact Matches in H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.02 | 4 | 0 | 0 % | 86 % | |
135 | Down 3 | Variations in Legend Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 10 | 0 | 0 % | 87 % | |
136 | Down 6 | Exact Matches making whole Title Tag Relevancy | -0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 85 % | |
137 | Down 4 | Exact Matches making whole H4-H6 Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0 % | 87 % | |
138 | Down 3 | Exact Matches making whole H4 Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0 % | 89 % | |
139 | Down 3 | Variations in Pre Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 10 | 0 | 0 % | 89 % | |
140 | Variations in Q Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 21 | 0 | 0 % | 95 % | ||
141 | Up 14 | Exact Match Term Frequency Relevancy | -0.01 | -0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 91 % |
142 | Down 1 | Variations Making Whole U Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 95 % | |
143 | Down 4 | Variations in Code Tags Relevancy | -0.01 | 22 | 0 | 0 % | 88 % | |
144 | Down 7 | Variations in Mark Tags Relevancy | -0 | 11 | 0 | 0 % | 91 % | |
145 | Down 3 | Variations in INS Tags Relevancy | -0 | 10 | 0 | 0 % | 90 % | |
146 | Down 3 | Exact Matches making whole H5 Tags Relevancy | -0 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 91 % | |
147 | Variations in Sub Tags Relevancy | -0 | 11 | 0 | 0 % | 95 % | ||
148 | Down 4 | Exact Matches making whole H6 Tags Relevancy | -0 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 93 % | |
149 | Down 4 | Variations in Abbr Tags Relevancy | -0 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 92 % | |
150 | Down 2 | Variations in Dfn Tags Relevancy | -0 | 11 | 0 | 0 % | 93 % | |
151 | Down 13 | Variations in Dialog Tags Relevancy | -0 | 1 | 0 | 0 % | 93 % | |
152 | Down 3 | Variations in Del Tags Relevancy | -0 | 2 | 0 | 0 % | 93 % | |
153 | Down 1 | Variations in Samp Tags Relevancy | -0 | 11 | 0 | 0 % | 97 % | |
154 | Down 3 | Variations in Strike Tags Relevancy | -0 | 11 | 0 | 0 % | 97 % | |
155 | Down 9 | Clean Variation Density Relevancy | -0 | 3 | 0 | 0 % | 94 % | |
156 | enter | Leading Variations in Search Result URL Domain Name Relevancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 18 % | |
157 | Down 4 | Leading Variations in Search Result URL Host Name Relevancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 60 % | |
158 | Down 4 | Variations in Search Result URL Subdomain Relevancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 79 % | |
159 | Down 3 | Exact Match TF/IDF Relevancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 94 % |